Skip to main content

Bank Nationalisation Good or Bad !!!


Conclusions about what nationalisation has achieved must consider the counter-factual situation of
what could have been achieved had there been no nationalization. The benefits of nationalization can
only be estimated using this counterfactual. There have been some careful studies that have looked at
the impact of bank nationalization using this careful lens. The findings are mixed.
Burgess and Pande (2005) study the RBI’s 4:1 formula where a bank was required to open 4 rural
branches to obtain a license to open an urban branch between years 1977 and 1991. They find that the
policy led to significant reduction in poverty in financially less developed states. However, Kochar
(2005) argues that integrated rural development program (IRDP), the Government’s flagship poverty
alleviation program, was actively implemented during this period with greater intensity in financially
less developed states. Therefore, it is almost impossible to conclude that government bank branch
expansion caused reduction in poverty. Panagariya (2006) also rejects the findings in Burgess and
Pande (2005) by arguing that the branch expansion program of similar intensity existed even before
nationalization and hence the 1977-1991 period is not special in terms of branch expansion. In other words, differential impact on poverty seen during 1977-1991 cannot be attributed to nationalization.
Finally, Cole (2009) carefully examines the impact of the second wave of bank nationalization
undertaken in the year 1980. He exploits the fact that banks above certain threshold size were
nationalized and compares regions having higher proportion of banks that marginally crossed the
nationalization threshold and regions having higher proportion of banks that narrowly missed the
threshold. The study finds no significant benefit of nationalization on the real economy. In fact, he
shows that employment in trade and services declines and the quality of financial intermediation
deteriorated. There was increase only in the quantity of credit.
Over and above these studies, we also know that despite nationalization a significant portion of
the poor remained unbanked till 2014. Financial inclusion, in large part, happened in August 2014
through the Pradhan Mantri Jan Dhan Yojana (PMJDY), the first week of which saw more than 18
million bank accounts—a record in the Guinness Book of World Records.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

evaporation

what causes water to evaporate every fluid (pure) has a definite vapor pressure at a fixed temperature , now if any how the partial presuure of the fluiid is less then the the vapor pressure of the fluid then the fluid starts evaporating to attain the partial pressure equal to the  vapor pressure of the fluid, and then the equllibrium is reached and evaporation stops.                              basically at the top of the fluid there is a random motion of the fluid molecule due to the difference between the adhasive and cohesive forces, some molecule say 'n' goes into the vapur phase and some strikes back say m such that n>m then after the above explained condition is achived then the constraint m=n. conclusion whenever there is the fluid in liquid state is  present then in that system partial pressure is exactly to the va...
Post a Comment
Read more

NITI Aayog::: M LAXMIKANTH

Chap 52 NITI AAYOG -- Created by “Executive Resolution” ….resolution of Cabinet . --Therefore its neither a constitutional body nor Statutory body (not by Parliament) --Replaced “Top to Bottom” approach of Planning commission. -- NEED= after liberalization>>>diff states achieved diff economic stage>>>diff requirement>>> “ one size filts all ” formulae of top to bottom   = now redundant. Compostion: ( follows structure of Council of minister): --Chairman = PM --Vice Chairman= Appointed by PM (rank of Cabinet minister) --Members =(of Minister rank)    >Full time(Permanent)=Expert in the field …..appointed by PM    >Part time(temp)= Max 2…from leading University+Reserch institute……Appointed by PM    >Ex-officio= like ministers at centre….Ex- Amit shah, Home minister…..Appointed by PM.    >CEO=(rank of union council of minister) Appointed by PM --Other members:   >Form...
Post a Comment
Read more

Santhal Paragana Tenancy Act, 1949 : Overview and issues

Colonial Background:- Administrative division of Santhal Parganas covers the geographical area of Rajmahal hills, and valleys and plains area along the hills. This area was never under jurisdiction of any of the rulers before the arrival of colonial power, more so Damin–i-koh area ( Jungelarry tracts). This area was semi-independent country under Pahariya tribes .The East India Company introduced extractive zamindari system through Zamindars of Sultanbad (Maheshpur) and Ambar (Pakur) to maximise land revenue and also introduced market and monetary economy into the primitive tribal economy in the 18th century. These Zamindars, traders, money lenders, contractors, other service providers and company employees started exploiting the innocent tribal and evicted tribal from their own land. This led to Pahariya Sirkars in 1777-78 and more famous Santhal Insurrection (popularly called Hul) of 1855-57. During this time, British introduced a special system of administration and for this Act XXX...
1 comment
Read more