Skip to main content

Basic structure : M Laxmikanth


Polity


Chap 11


Basic structure

Chronology  FR Vs DPSP:


Shankri prashad vs Union = Law in article 13 does not include amendment. Thus Ar 368 provides amendment for FR

Golaknath Vs State of Punjab =(related to  9th schedule) =reversal Ar 13 also include Ammendment à FR cant be changed.
Parliament retaliation part 1= amended Ar13 and Ar368  à now parliament is authorized to amend FR.
Keshwananda Bharti case Vs kerla = Basic structure  can’t be violated while amending FR  or any provisions of constitution.

Parliament retaliation part 2 =42nd  Ammended Ar368 à now amendment can’t be challenged in any court.

Minerva Mills Vs Union = invalidated above 42nd  amendment which excluded judicial review. Thus judicial review= Basic structure

Basic structure
1.       Supremacy of the constitution
2.       Sovereign , democratic, and republican polity
3.       Secular
4.       Separation of powers
5.       Federal
6.       Unity and intefrity
7.       Welfare state(socio-economic justice)
8.       Judicial review
9.       Freedom and dignity of individual
10.   Parliamentary system
11.   Rule of law
12.   Balance between FR and DPSP
13.   Principle of equality
14.   Free and fair election
15.   Independence of judiciary
16.   Limited power of parliament to amend
17.   Effective access to justice
18.   Principle underlying FR
19.   Power of SC= Ar 32, 141 , 142
20.   Power of high Court= Ar 226 and 227

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

evaporation

what causes water to evaporate every fluid (pure) has a definite vapor pressure at a fixed temperature , now if any how the partial presuure of the fluiid is less then the the vapor pressure of the fluid then the fluid starts evaporating to attain the partial pressure equal to the  vapor pressure of the fluid, and then the equllibrium is reached and evaporation stops.                              basically at the top of the fluid there is a random motion of the fluid molecule due to the difference between the adhasive and cohesive forces, some molecule say 'n' goes into the vapur phase and some strikes back say m such that n>m then after the above explained condition is achived then the constraint m=n. conclusion whenever there is the fluid in liquid state is  present then in that system partial pressure is exactly to the va...

NITI Aayog::: M LAXMIKANTH

Chap 52 NITI AAYOG -- Created by “Executive Resolution” ….resolution of Cabinet . --Therefore its neither a constitutional body nor Statutory body (not by Parliament) --Replaced “Top to Bottom” approach of Planning commission. -- NEED= after liberalization>>>diff states achieved diff economic stage>>>diff requirement>>> “ one size filts all ” formulae of top to bottom   = now redundant. Compostion: ( follows structure of Council of minister): --Chairman = PM --Vice Chairman= Appointed by PM (rank of Cabinet minister) --Members =(of Minister rank)    >Full time(Permanent)=Expert in the field …..appointed by PM    >Part time(temp)= Max 2…from leading University+Reserch institute……Appointed by PM    >Ex-officio= like ministers at centre….Ex- Amit shah, Home minister…..Appointed by PM.    >CEO=(rank of union council of minister) Appointed by PM --Other members:   >Form...

Fundamental Right

 Article 22 22(1): ->Arrested person should be provided with "REASON FOR ARREST" ->LAWYER of his choice 22(2): ->arrested person should be brought before MAGISTRATE within 24 hour (minus travel time to magistrate) 22(3): -> 3 means TRISHUL 🔱 --> 22(1) and 22(2)  not applied : ==for enemy alien  ==If arrested for preventive detention law 22(4): ->NO PREVENTIVE DETENTION law shall authorise MORE then 3 MONTH detention unless: == advisory body having HC judge equivalent has reported for extention before expiry of said duration 22(5): ->Detained PERSON should be briefed about GROUND OF DETENTION 22(6): -> 22(5) cant force authority to disclose facts related to order which such authority considers to be against public interest to disclose. 22(7): Parliament may by law extend 3 month detention without obtaining opinion from advisory body{22(4)}