Skip to main content

NHRC+SHRC ::: M LAXMIKANTH






COMPOSITION
NHRC
SHRC
Multi-Member
Chairman + 4 members(Full time) + 4 ex offico members
Chairman + 2 members
Chairman
Retired CJI
Retired CJH (C J of High court)
Members
1= Judge of SC (Retired/Serving)
1= CJH (retired/ serving)
2= knowledge + experience in Human rights
4 ex-officio members:
Chairman of = National commission for (SC ,ST ,Women and Minority)
1= Judge of HC(serving/retired)
     Or Judge of District court(7 year experience)
1= knowledge + experience in Human rights
Appointed by
President
(same =UPSC/SPSC/CIC/SIC/CAG/NHRC/SHRC/CVC)
Governor
recommendation
Committee
6 member committee:
PM(head)+ Speaker(L.S)+Deputy chairmen(R.S)+ Leader of Opp(LS and RS) + union Home Minister
+Judge of SC(seating) + CJH(seating) after consultation of CJI.
CM(Head)+ Speaker+Leader off Opp+State Home minister + if upper house exists(Leader of Opp + Chairman of council)
+Judge of HC(seating) + District judge(seating) after consultation of CJH.
Term
5 year/ 75 Age (as MPs are involved)
5 Year/ 70 age
Reappointment
-------
Yes till 70 age limit
After tenure
No job under Union or State /gov
No job under Union or State /gov



REMOVAL
NHRC
SHRC

By President
Same
(although appointed=governor)
Condition
(Chairman+member)
Insolvent+ paid employment(out side office) + unfit(Physical +mental)+ unsound mind by court + convicted and sentenced to imprisonment.
Same
Additional condn
(Chairma+ member)
Misbehavior  + but president has to refer case to SC= SC judgment is final.
same as UPSC/SPSC/CIC/SIC/CAG/NHRC/SHRC/CVC)…click here
Same


Independance
NHRC
SHRC
Salary/allowance etc
Determined by Central gov >>>>>>>>Cant be varied after appointment
By State gov >>>>>>>>>>> Cant be varied after appointment.
Condition service
By Central Gov but cant be change after
By state but cant be changed later.
After tenure
No job under Gov
Same



FUNCTION
NHRC
SHRC
inquire
--Violation of HR(ex-Hydrabad encounter)
--Suo moto / through petition.

Same
Intervene in court
HR cases pending in court
Same
Varifies
Condition of Jail + detention camp || recommends any changes needed
Same
Reviews
1)Constitutional+Legal sageguards.
2)Act of terrorism that inhibits HR|| recommends measures.
Same
Study
Treaties+ International instruments = @ HR
 ---------Nil------
Reserch & promotion
in HR + spread HR literacy among people
Same
NGO
To encourage them in field of HR
Same





Working
NHRC
SHRC

Regulates its own procedure
Same

Has all powers of Civil court
Same

It can take any report @ HR form Centre gov
From state gov
Time Limit
Can’t enquire after expiry of 1 year.
(Ahmadi committee
=if enough evidence should be allowed to enquire after 1 year)
Same
POWERS
(During inquiry)↓



Recommend concerned Gov+authority= for compensation to victim
Same
Civil servant
It can recommend for proceeding against CS
Same

Recommend for Grant= as interim relief
Same
Courts
May approach(SC+SC) for necessary direction + writs
Same
--All recommendation + relief ↑= not binding.
--But NHRC/SHRC= should be informed within 1 Month= about the action taken on their recommendation.
--NHRC/SHRC submits annual repor or special report to  Government (Centre/State) >>>> gov puts in Legislature along with Memorandum, explain the reason of non acceptance of advice.[UPSC/SPSC = report submitted to PRESIDENT].
ARMED FORCE(only NHRC)
--Include= Army +Navy +Air force (not Para military forces)
--Can just seek report from Gov
--Gov should reply within 3 months.
--So it(NHRC) has limited role.(SHRC no powers)


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

evaporation

what causes water to evaporate every fluid (pure) has a definite vapor pressure at a fixed temperature , now if any how the partial presuure of the fluiid is less then the the vapor pressure of the fluid then the fluid starts evaporating to attain the partial pressure equal to the  vapor pressure of the fluid, and then the equllibrium is reached and evaporation stops.                              basically at the top of the fluid there is a random motion of the fluid molecule due to the difference between the adhasive and cohesive forces, some molecule say 'n' goes into the vapur phase and some strikes back say m such that n>m then after the above explained condition is achived then the constraint m=n. conclusion whenever there is the fluid in liquid state is  present then in that system partial pressure is exactly to the va...

NITI Aayog::: M LAXMIKANTH

Chap 52 NITI AAYOG -- Created by “Executive Resolution” ….resolution of Cabinet . --Therefore its neither a constitutional body nor Statutory body (not by Parliament) --Replaced “Top to Bottom” approach of Planning commission. -- NEED= after liberalization>>>diff states achieved diff economic stage>>>diff requirement>>> “ one size filts all ” formulae of top to bottom   = now redundant. Compostion: ( follows structure of Council of minister): --Chairman = PM --Vice Chairman= Appointed by PM (rank of Cabinet minister) --Members =(of Minister rank)    >Full time(Permanent)=Expert in the field …..appointed by PM    >Part time(temp)= Max 2…from leading University+Reserch institute……Appointed by PM    >Ex-officio= like ministers at centre….Ex- Amit shah, Home minister…..Appointed by PM.    >CEO=(rank of union council of minister) Appointed by PM --Other members:   >Form...

Fundamental Right

 Article 22 22(1): ->Arrested person should be provided with "REASON FOR ARREST" ->LAWYER of his choice 22(2): ->arrested person should be brought before MAGISTRATE within 24 hour (minus travel time to magistrate) 22(3): -> 3 means TRISHUL 🔱 --> 22(1) and 22(2)  not applied : ==for enemy alien  ==If arrested for preventive detention law 22(4): ->NO PREVENTIVE DETENTION law shall authorise MORE then 3 MONTH detention unless: == advisory body having HC judge equivalent has reported for extention before expiry of said duration 22(5): ->Detained PERSON should be briefed about GROUND OF DETENTION 22(6): -> 22(5) cant force authority to disclose facts related to order which such authority considers to be against public interest to disclose. 22(7): Parliament may by law extend 3 month detention without obtaining opinion from advisory body{22(4)}