Skip to main content

Which of the following International Labour Organization (ILO) convention have NOT been ratified by
India?
1. Abolition of Forced Labour Convention, 1957
2. Equal Remuneration Convention, 1951
3. Freedom of Association and Protection of the Right to Organise Convention, 1948
4. Minimum Age Convention, 1973

Context: The ILO Governing Body has identified eight “fundamental” Conventions, covering
subjects that are considered to be fundamental principles and rights at work: freedom of association
and the effective recognition of the right to collective bargaining; the elimination of all forms of
forced or compulsory labour; the effective abolition of child labour; and the elimination of
discrimination in respect of employment and occupation. These principles are also covered by the
ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (1998).
The ILO is urging the Union Government to ratify two of its fundamental conventions — Freedom of
Association and Protection of the Right to Organise Convention, 1948 (No. 87) and Right to
Organise and Collective Bargaining Convention, 1949 (No. 98).
Justification: In India, we ratify an ILO Convention only when the national laws are brought fully
into conformity with the provisions of the Convention in question.
The main reason for non-ratification of ILO Conventions is due to certain restrictions imposed
on the Government servants.
As communicated by Department of Personnel & Training (DOPT), the ratification of these
conventions would involve granting of certain rights that are prohibited under the statutory
rules, for the Government employees.
These are: to strike work, to openly criticize Government policies, to freely accept financial
contribution, to freely join foreign organizations etc.
Learning:
India has ratified six out of the eight core ILO Conventions:
--the Forced Labour Convention, 1930
--Abolition of Forced Labour Convention, 1957
--Equal Remuneration Convention, 1951
--Discrimination (Employment and Occupation) Convention, 1958
--Minimum Age Convention, 1973
--Worst Forms of Child Labour Convention, 1999

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NITI Aayog::: M LAXMIKANTH

Chap 52 NITI AAYOG -- Created by “Executive Resolution” ….resolution of Cabinet . --Therefore its neither a constitutional body nor Statutory body (not by Parliament) --Replaced “Top to Bottom” approach of Planning commission. -- NEED= after liberalization>>>diff states achieved diff economic stage>>>diff requirement>>> “ one size filts all ” formulae of top to bottom   = now redundant. Compostion: ( follows structure of Council of minister): --Chairman = PM --Vice Chairman= Appointed by PM (rank of Cabinet minister) --Members =(of Minister rank)    >Full time(Permanent)=Expert in the field …..appointed by PM    >Part time(temp)= Max 2…from leading University+Reserch institute……Appointed by PM    >Ex-officio= like ministers at centre….Ex- Amit shah, Home minister…..Appointed by PM.    >CEO=(rank of union council of minister) Appointed by PM --Other members:   >Form...

Why the iconoclast social reformer Periyar matters in Tamil Nadu? Discuss the contributions of Periyar and significance as of today.(250 words)

The whole object of reservation is to see that backward classes of citizens move forward so that they may march hand in hand with other citizens of India on an equal basis. Analyse.

For video link to understand in detail.... Click here For text link(Diff) to understand in detail....Click here  (Contains NCRB) For another answer explaining reservation issue....click here [ -- “A study by Thorat and Attewell in 2010 observed that for equally qualified SC and upper caste (about 4800 each) applicants, SCs had 67 percent less chance of receiving calls for an interview. --Need a survey for hate they face...to remove reservation for SC/ST. --NCRB now includes "Insult" as parametre in survey. =========================================================