PDS
Objective:
→Food security
→Price stabilisation
Function:
→Procurement
→Transportation
→Rationcard
→identifying the poor and needy:
IMAGE= Table
Limitation:
→MSP procurement approx of 10%Farmers.
→Procurement limited to few states like punjab, haryana, Andhra pradesh etc.
→Excessive buffer stock….leads to subsidy expenditure.
→Poor infrastructure for grading and other facility.
→Loss due to pshiphon off is about 40%.
Revamping:
>12th five year plan’s working Group on PDS and Food Security’s reccomendation:
→PDS or TPDS only for BPL.
→only rice + Wheat should be distributed…..others like sugar should be left to market.
→FPS(Fair Price Shop) should be allow to sale all other unregulated commodities at market price to oerate viably.
→Bufferstock should be managed thorugh Export/Import to meet fluctuation along with internal sale and procurement.
→Private player should be allowed for non subsidised food storage and transportation and procurement…..to check pshioponing of materials (aprox 40% gets pshiphoned off
Issue of Buffer stock and Food security:
@FAO=3Pillars of Food security:
1)Avaibility 2)Affordablity 3)Stability of price 4)Nutrition.
Inida sepecific(To achieve above):
1)Boost production:
>bcoz surplus regions like Punjab ,Haryana, AP etc cant be relied upon for further inc in population.
2)Limited presence in internation market:
>India produces 22% of world paddy and 12% of Wheat.
>But world trade in rice=10% of india;’s domestic production.
>So, if we focus on export…..It will at max benefit us 10%......but will significantly bring down international Price making it less profitable…..and our farm is not so techy to bear low price shock.
3)Ensure regional food security:
>Kerla has 3% of population and enjoys share of 12% of PDS of food grains.
>While state like bihar benefits least from any operation of PDS.
>Private player should be increased in PDS business atleast for APL(not BPL).
.
4)Stablisation of price:
>Buffer stock.
5)Subsidised food grain to poors:
>PDS.
Tech Missions:
Economics of Animal Rearing:
→Livestock= 4% of GDP / 26% of Agri GDP.
→India’s Milk yeild per animal=50% of world avg.
=Reason for Loss of Diary potential(Per cow):
>Breeding +Health and management+Feeding(Major)
>Gov action:
>>Rashtriya Gokul Mission= for indigenious cow….breeding + yeild↑
>>E-Pashu Haat Portal= a platform for farmers and indeginous breeder…all info of certified breed are availble …farmer can order breeding for her cow.
>>National Program for Bovine Breeding= for Artificial Insemination.
→India’s Meat yeild per animal=20-60%.
→Experience shows states like J&K,H.P, Punjab, Haryana, Rajasthan, Gujrat, Kerala etc….where livestock accounts for sizeable share of agri income has less poverty.
Challenges:
→Green house Gas:
Ruminant livestock generates a significant proportion of anthropogenic GHG emissions, and thereby contribute to Climate Change. Ruminants such as cattle, sheep, goats, and buffalo produce meat and milk through fermentation inside intestine– a digestive process in which microbes decompose and ferment food in the digestive tract or rumen. This process produces methane which is emitted via belching
→Disease:
FMD,BQ, PPR, Ifluenza
→Lack of Vatinary doctor although livestock is same as humans in india population wise.
→Lack of institutional finace
Livestock sector has received less then 40% Credit(Short , medium or long term).
→Market is dominatied by informal intermediaries….who exploits producers.
→Lack of slaughter hause….about 50% of meat production comes form unregistered slaughter house, makes-hift slaughter houses.
Authority | Role | Details
|
National sample survey organization | Conduct sample survey of consumer expenditure every five year | Consumer expenditure is the expenditure of household on some basic goods and services. The expenditure on this basket of goods is the basis of poverty line.
|
Planning commission | Estimates state wise poverty such as number of people below the poverty line.
| Uses NSSO household expenditure data |
Central government | Allocates food grains to each states based on state wise poverty estimates of planning commission and population projections of the register general of India as March 2000 | The number of BPL families has been calculated using 1993-94 poverty estimates by Planning commission. This number has not been revised despite the release of new poverty estimates by the planning commission in 2004-52011-12. |
Ministry of rural development | Comes out with criteria for inclusion and exclusion from BPL list as part of its BPL census | Criteria for classification of BPL families, as per BPL census 2002, include parameters like size of land holding clothing owned, food security means of livelihood.
|
State government | Identify eligible households | Based on above criteria
|
Comments
Post a Comment